Bone to pick with PRSA article

Thursday, July 2, 2009 by Chuck Gose
I admit. I got a bit excited when I received the latest PRSA's PR Tactics in the mail yesterday. Aside from the usual ranting of the same people, it has some really good and insightful articles in it from pros doing the work.

But the headline on the current edition is "Fast Forward: Video's continued evolution." That's right up my alley. I was hoping to there would be content focused on employee communications and not just PR and I wasn't disappointed.

PRSA PR TacticsSo on page 13, I make it to an article by Mike McDougall, APR, titled, "The changing rules of the video game: Integrating online video into everyday communications."

Reading through the article, I agree with most of Mike's comments, with the key word being "most." He writes about the use of glossy corporate video compared to more home grown versions with employees shooting their own. Solid advice. Along with reminders about how inexpensive video is now. Couldn't agree more.

So I make it to the subhead, "Video for employee engagement." Now we're talking. The good stuff. . . . right?

"A decade ago, company video networks were the rage, with TV monitors scattered across lobbies, cafeterias, break rooms, plant floors and more. But with the advent of intranets the monitors were soon gathering dust as employee communication shifted online. Intranets killed the video star."

What!?

Maybe a decade ago it was the rage, but the rage continues as small and large corporations are looking at digital signage as a way to reach all employees, not just those who don't have traditional access to email, voice mail and the intranet. Many like to single out the manufacturing workforce as if they are some sort of neanderthal workforce because they don't have easy access when actually many organizations (retail and hospitals for example) have thousands upon thousands of workers who don't stare at computer screens all day.

Also what I'm seeing and hearing is that employees are growing tired of always staring at their computer screens (if they have them). If you've been working at your desk all day, are you going to stay sitting there and watch (and pay attention) to a 5 or 10-minute video? So this is where communicators need to reach out and communicate in different ways. For many companies, digital signage is that different way.

And if dust was gathering on the screens as Mike suggests, it was because various communication departments lost focus and neglected the tool. It wasn't because employees weren't paying attention. And let's say it was because employees weren't paying attention, then the content must have stunk, which will kill any communications vehicle out there.

I'm all for video being pushed to the intranet. It's great, especially for remote or mobile employees who otherwise wouldn't have access. But even today, you mention to your IT department that you're interested in hosting lots of video and possibly even stream it, you'll likely either be met with blank stares or bouts of laughter. Yes, IT people do laugh.

And I guess I'm a bit confused by Mike's statement that intranets killed the video star but then he goes on to talk about the use of video on the intranet.

The video star is alive and well. You, the communicator, are the video star. You just need to make sure you have the right vehicles in place to deliver that video message.

Nice to get that all off my chest.

Comments for Bone to pick with PRSA article

Thursday, July 2, 2009 by Sean Williams:
I love it, Chuck. The idea that everyone will simply accept lo-res, lo-quality, amateur video, huddled in their cubicles is horse hockey. This is a classic case of making assumptions about people's preferences rather than doing research prior to planning. Here's how this mistaken thinking goes: YouTube and other online video is popular We could host our own You Tube and not bother with slick content Our employees will want to watch our programs Everyone will use a camera video phone to record their own stuff We can cut our budgets for other communications. First of all, content still is king. You Tube has had to pony up for professional video in order to attract viewers. Amateurs still, hilariously at times, catch lightning in a bottle, but mostly, the hottest stuff has great production values, is well written, edited and timely. I don't work for MediaTile or any other video distribution company, I'm just an entrepreneur who used to run a corporate video department. But Chuck is right -- digital signage is a wave of the future, not the least because it can replace posters and other point of sale materials, which increases connection to sales. Our corporate video for employee use piggybacks on that technology. Mind, you still need to shoot good video -- it still needs to look like a TV show. But you can augment with user-generated content on the web -- for example, show your corporate piece and encourage people to shoot their own and upload it. Two different vehicles, two different objectives.
Thursday, July 2, 2009 by Sonja:
Good additional perspective. You should write a letter to the editor. And/or submit your own bylined article to PR Tactics!
Thursday, July 2, 2009 by Chuck Gose:
Thank you Sean and Sonja for your thoughts. And I couldn't agree more with you Sean. It always bothers me when communicators make assumptions based on the fact that their work experience is the same everywhere else. Employee-generated video is great, and so is communicator-generated. Happy Fourth to you both! And we'll see about the letter to the editor Sonja. That's not a bad idea.

Leave a comment





Captcha